Saturday, January 27, 2007

XML UI's revisted (XAML, XUL and AJAX)

Back in October I made a post about WPF and my concerns around it. Now the European Committee for Interoperable Systems (ECIS), has raised similar concerns. To be fair some of the points raised by the people at the respectable Ars Technica site are valid on this point. Their article on this development raises many issues that indicate XAML (WPF) is not quite a full scale attack on standards (not yet anyway). A review of WPF at Wikipedia.

This was interesting news for me to wake up to since I have been thinking about XML based GUI's lately in relation to the Grails development I have been doing. Grails recently added OpenLaszlo as a build option for interfaces. (Ref: http://grails.codehaus.org/OpenLaszlo+plugin)

The combination of XHTML and JavaSript to make user interfaces via AJAX that one can embedd into XHTML is currently all the rage. One can contrast this with XUL as yet another plus JavasScriptUI toolset. The process of embedding XUL UI's into XHTML might not be so clear to me at this time. Though perhaps XHTML in XUL is more likely anyway. I need to investigate this and also how CDF might play into this. Blending AJAX and XUL approaches might be an interesting gadonkin.

In the same manner that the grails generate-views command can be used to make XHTML interfaces the grails generate-laszlo is used to scaffold artifacts for Laszlo. So why not a grails generate-xul command? Indeed, as the Ars article points out it is hard to imagine anything that could compete with the ubiquitous presence of HTML. However, for web applications the ability to auto generate different UI's (XHTML, XUL, OpenLaszlo, etc) has some appeal. If this is done automatically from the domain classes with common class extensions to a set of scaffold'ed artifacts then a developer can simply worry about the application and the elements a UI needs and leave the final implementation of the UI up to the user. If the user wants XUL, then give that, if the user wants OpenLaszlo then give that. This might have more appeal yet as the web moves toward things like the iPhone, or the OpenMoko.

Also of note in that regard is the development of things like Wazaabi which brings XUL to the Eclipse RPC environment which can be used develop rich client applications. A friend of mine has used Eclipse RPC in his efforts related to work in Antarctica. :)

In conclusion I believe that the generation of richer UI's delivered across the web to browsers or brokered out to supporting apps by browsers is a developing trend. I'm interested to see how the Grails application framework could be used to generate XUL interfaces that are used from within Mozilla based browsers like Firefox. Combine this with the Mircoformats based semantics I have written previously about and I start to see a component framework built around Web standards and protocols. I need to build an example of some of this to truly investigate it.

2 comments:

Anesha said...

Hi Nice Blog .The experienced Data Entry team uses advanced, programmatic, content analysis and transformation tools to deliver accurate, fast and re-usable xml data conversion solutions at lower costs.

Leon Victor said...

Mozilla based browsers are continually gaining market share in the browser market which means over time XUL can be an alternative to consider. IT uses JavaScript, CSS and the DOM which makes it similar to the AJAX framework and it also allows creating dynamic content without the need of refreshing a page.